首页> 外文OA文献 >Model choices to obtain adjusted risk difference estimates from a binomial regression model with convergence problems: an assessment of methods of adjusted risk difference estimation
【2h】

Model choices to obtain adjusted risk difference estimates from a binomial regression model with convergence problems: an assessment of methods of adjusted risk difference estimation

机译:从具有收敛性问题的二项式回归模型中获得调整后的风险差异估计的模型选择:调整后的风险差异估计方法的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Risk Difference (RD) is becoming the measure of choice for estimating effect size in antimalarial drug efficacy trials. Calculating RD using binomial regression is prone to model nonconvergence. Cheung's modified ordinary least squares (OLS) method is a proven technique for handling non-convergence when estimating RD. Other promising methods include the Poison, Additive Binomial Regression and binary regression models fitted using the statistical package R. (Deddens') Copy method that was primarily developed to overcome non-convergence of log-binomial regression models when estimating risk ratios is another potential method. Simulations were conducted to compare the performance of the Copy method against four alternatives (Cheung's modified OLS method, the Additive Binomial Regression Model fitted with the blm algorithm, the binary regression model fitted with the glm2 algorithm, and the Poisson model with identity link and robust standard errors fitted with the glm algorithm) for obtaining RD estimates when a binomial model fails to converge.Methods: We computed estimates of efficiency and bias with treatment arm efficacies of (a) 60% vs. 85%, (b) 95% vs. 90%, (iii) 95% vs. 98% using simulation studies. A total of 5,000 datasets were simulated under each of these three scenarios.Results: The modified OLS method and the binary regression model fitted using the glm2 algorithm in R provided unbiased, efficient estimates of RD across all assessed scenarios. In contrast, the Copy method yielded biased estimates of RD even when 100% convergence was achieved. The Poisson and Additive Binomial Regression models had 100% and almost 100% convergence rates respectively, but both produced very slightly biased RD estimates.Conclusion: The Copy method is not suitable for estimating RD when binomial regression model fitting fails to converge. Cheung's modified OLS or the binary regression model fitted using the glm2 algorithm in R should be the method of choice to overcome non-convergence with binomial models for calculating adjusted RD estimates.
机译:背景:风险差异(RD)已成为评估抗疟药功效试验中效应大小的一种选择措施。使用二项式回归计算RD易于模型不收敛。 Cheung的改进的普通最小二乘(OLS)方法是一种在估计RD时处理非收敛性的成熟技术。其他有前途的方法包括使用统计软件包R拟合的Poison,加法二项式回归和二元回归模型。(Deddens')Copy方法主要用于克服对数二项式回归模型的不收敛性,这是另一种潜在的方法。进行了仿真以比较Copy方法与四种替代方法的性能(Cheung的改进的OLS方法,装有blm算法的加法二项式回归模型,装有glm2算法的二元回归模型以及具有标识链接和鲁棒性的Poisson模型)方法:我们计算了(a)60%vs. 85%,(b)95%vs.的治疗臂功效的效率和偏倚的估计值,用于在二项式模型无法收敛时获得RD估计值。 90%,(iii)95%,而使用模拟研究则为98%。在这三种情况下,总共模拟了5,000个数据集。结果:改进的OLS方法和使用glm2算法在R中拟合的二进制回归模型在所有评估的情况下提供了RD的无偏,有效估计。相比之下,即使达到100%收敛,Copy方法也会产生RD的偏差估计。泊松模型和加法二项式回归模型分别具有100%和几乎100%的收敛速度,但是两者都产生了非常轻微的RD估计。结论:当二项回归模型拟合无法收敛时,Copy方法不适用于估计RD。应使用Cheung的改进型OLS或在R中使用glm2算法拟合的二进制回归模型作为克服二项式模型不收敛来计算调整后RD估计值的选择方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号